Dovitinib versus sorafenib for third-line targeted treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: motzerr@mskcc.org. Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy. Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA. San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy. Military Institute of Health Services in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Warsaw, Poland. BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy. Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany. Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

The Lancet. Oncology. 2014;(3):286-96

Abstract

BACKGROUND An unmet medical need exists for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on VEGF-targeted and mTOR-inhibitor therapies. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathway activation has been proposed as a mechanism of escape from VEGF-targeted therapies. Dovitinib is an oral tyrosine-kinase inhibitor that inhibits VEGF and FGF receptors. We therefore compared dovitinib with sorafenib as third-line targeted therapies in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS In this multicentre phase 3 study, patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received one previous VEGF-targeted therapy and one previous mTOR inhibitor were randomly assigned through an interactive voice and web response system to receive open-label dovitinib (500 mg orally according to a 5-days-on and 2-days-off schedule) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) in a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation was stratified by risk group and region. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by masked central review. Efficacy was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01223027. FINDINGS 284 patients were randomly assigned to the dovitinib group and 286 to the sorafenib group. Median follow-up was 11·3 months (IQR 7·9-14·6). Median PFS was 3·7 months (95% CI 3·5-3·9) in the dovitinib group and 3·6 months (3·5-3·7) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·72-1·04; one-sided p=0·063). 280 patients in the dovitinib group and 284 in the sorafenib group received at least one dose of study drug. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included hypertriglyceridaemia (38 [14%]), fatigue (28 [10%]), hypertension (22 [8%]), and diarrhoea (20 [7%]) in the dovitinib group, and hypertension (47 [17%]), fatigue (24 [8%]), dyspnoea (21 [7%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (18 [6%]) in the sorafenib group. The most common serious adverse event was dyspnoea (16 [6%] and 15 [5%] in the dovitinib and sorafenib groups, respectively). INTERPRETATION Dovitinib showed activity, but this was no better than that of sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma who had progressed on previous VEGF-targeted therapies and mTOR inhibitors. This trial provides reference outcome data for future studies of targeted inhibitors in the third-line setting. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Methodological quality

Metadata